European Projects
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/428
Browse
Item Adult Migrant Education Methodology(2016) DIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT GROUPItem Adult migrant education methodology and the integration programs analysis(2016) DIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT GROUP; CENTRE FOR ADVANCEMENT OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY LTD; FUNDACJA OSRODEK BADAN NAD MIGRACJAMI; KOPERAZZJONI INTERNAZZJONALI; TAMAT CENTRO STUDI FORMAZIONE E RICERCA; UNIVERSIDAD DE SALAMANCAItem AUDASPACE(2016-02) Crespo Galán, Juan FranciscoItem Experiencia como coordinador y socio en proyectos Erasmus+. Caso del Grupo GRIAL de la USAL(Grupo GRIAL, 2016-12-13) García-Peñalvo, Francisco J.Presentación de la experiencia del Grupo GRIAL coordinando y participando en proyectos Erasmus+ en la Jornada Informativa Erasmus+ “Convocatoria 2017 y Preparación de Propuestas”, celebrada en el Aula Francisco Salinas, Edificio Histórico, Universidad de Salamanca el 13 de diciembre de 2016.Item Final Quality Assurance Report(2016-02-29) Kearney, NickItem Final Report(2016-02-29) García-Peñalvo, Francisco J.; Cruz-Benito, Juan; Griffiths, Dai; Zangrando, ValentinaItem Interim Report(2016-02-29) García-Peñalvo, Francisco J.; Cruz-Benito, Juan; Griffiths, Dai; Zangrando, ValentinaItem Presentation of the paper “Computational thinking beyond STEM: an introduction to “moral machines” and programming decision making in Ethics classroom”(2016-11-02) Seoane-Pardo, Antonio M.This is the presentation of the paper entitled “Computational thinking beyond STEM: an introduction to “moral machines” and programming decision making in Ethics classroom” in the TEEM 2016 International Conference held in Salamanca (Spain) in November 2-4, 2016. This work describes a learning activity on computational thinking in Ethics classroom with compulsory secondary school students (14-16 years). It is based on the assumption that computational thinking (or better “logical thinking”) is applicable not only to STEM subjects but to any other field in education, and it is particularly suited to decision making in moral dilemmas. This will be carried out through the study of so called “moral machines”, using a game-based learning approach on self-driving vehicles and the need to program such cars to perform certain behaviors under extreme situations. Students will be asked to logically base their reasoning on different ethical approaches and try to develop a schema of decision making that could serve to program a machine to respond to those situations. Students will have to deal also with the uncertainty of reaching solutions that will be debatable and not universally accepted as part of de difficulty, more ethical than technical, to provide machines with the ability to take decisions where there is no such thing as a “right” versus “wrong” answer, and potentially both (ore more) of the possible actions will bring unwanted consequences.Item Recommendations for implementation of adult migrant integration programmes(2016) DIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT GROUP; CENTRE FOR ADVANCEMENT OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY LTD; FUNDACJA OSRODEK BADAN NAD MIGRACJAMI; KOPERAZZJONI INTERNAZZJONALI; TAMAT CENTRO STUDI FORMAZIONE E RICERCA; UNIVERSIDAD DE SALAMANCAItem Report on virtual placements organised for VALS pilots(2016-02-29) García-Peñalvo, Francisco J.; Cruz-Benito, Juan; Griffiths, DaiItem Report on virtual placements pilots and evaluation of their results - Virtual Alliances for Learning Society (VALS) project & Semester of Code(2015) García-Peñalvo, Francisco J.; Griffiths, Dai; Cruz-Benito, Juan; Veenendaal, E.; Achilleos, Achilleas; Wilson, S.; Kapitsaki, G.This deliverable explains the evaluations carried out regarding to the students’ intention to participate in the Semester of Code and VALS project and later the evaluation of the placements performed during the Semester of Code. The three main stakeholders involved performed these evaluations: students, mentors and academic supervisors. Apart of the main content of the evaluations and its questionnaires, this deliverable comment the results gathered among the different participants involved in the Semester of Code, explaining the key points and responses. Finally, are presented some conclusions about the evaluation results, comparing the main issues gatheredItem Revised Open Innovation Proccess Model(2016-02-29) Commisso, AlessandraItem Semester of Code guide for Organisations(2016-02-29) Veenendaal, Edwin; Elferink, RaymondItem Semester of Code guide for Universities(2016-02-29) Veenendaal, Edwin; Elferink, RaymondItem SORAPS PowerPoint Template(2019) Project, SORAPSItem SORAPS Teacher training course(2019-04) Project, SORAPSItem The Semester of Code Association(2016-02-29) García-Peñalvo, Francisco J.; Cruz-Benito, Juan; García-Holgado, Lucía; Veenendaal, Edwin; Elferink, Raymond