Publications

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/123456789/34

Browse

Author: search.filters.author.García-Peñalvo, F. J.Subject: search.filters.subject.Evaluation

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Unpacking the Evaluation Proceeding of Clinical Decision Support Systems: A review of methodological approaches and categories
    (CEUR-WS.org, 2023-12-05) Azadi, A.; García-Peñalvo, F. J.
    Medical personnel must utilize Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) to enhance clinical decision-making, minimize mistakes, and improve patient outcomes. Accurately evaluating the performance of CDSS is essential to avouch their effectiveness and efficiency. We have reviewed the literature to provide insights into evaluating CDSS, along with the criteria that need to be assessed, such as accuracy, usability, and efficiency. Researchers are instructed to pick an acceptable technique depending on their research aims and the situation in which they will analyze Clinical decision support systems after considering potential obstacles and constraints within the procedure. By conducting these types of research projects, we will be able to improve the quality of the decision-support systems and enhance their utility in clinical practice. This article provides valuable intuition for researchers, healthcare professionals, and decision-makers seeking to evaluate the performance of CDSS in healthcare settings.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    User Experience in Institutional Repositories: A Systematic Literature Review
    (IGI Global, 2018-01-01) González-Pérez, L. I.; Ramírez-Montoya, M. S.; García-Peñalvo, F. J.
    Disruptive ideas and innovative business models take shape from observing and investigating the needs and demands of potential users and measuring their success based on the acceptance by users and their satisfaction. In an educational context, a new mission of the university has emerged, supported by the transfer of open access knowledge through Institutional Repositories (IR); it is important to know the motivations and needs of the academic community to promote scientific dissemination using these platforms. The present article uses the method of systematic literature review: using 29 studies from SCOPUS and WoS, involving the topics User-Centered Design (UCD) and repositories. The results show that two of the three UCD phases—evaluation and requirements—are closely linked and are the reiterative focus of UCD; thus, it is desirable to promote the design of custommade prototypes according to the users’ motivations. It is necessary to redefine methodologies for IR development within open-access ecosystems to guide them towards meeting their potential users’ needs and motivations.