Documents
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/723
Browse
7 results
Search Results
Item Year 3 Quality and Evaluation Report. WP10_D10.10(WYRED Consortium, 2019-12-14) Kearney, N. A.H2020-SC6-REV-INEQUAL-2016 Grant Agreement number: 727066 1st November 2016 – 31st October 2019 Year 3 Quality and Evaluation Report WP10_D10.10Item Participant Protection Policy. Year 3 update. WP1_D1.7(WYRED Consortium, 2019-12-12) Kearney, N. A.Participant Protection Policy Year 3 update WP1_D1.7 H2020-SC6-REV-INEQUAL-2016 Grant Agreement number: 727066 1st November 2016 – 31st October 2019Item Initial Ethical Advisory Board Meeting. Deliverable number WP10_D10.14(WYRED Consortium, 2019-12-12) Kearney, N. A.Initial Ethical Advisory Board Meeting Deliverable number WP10_D10.14 H2020-SC6-REV-INEQUAL-2016 Grant Agreement number: 727066 1st November 2016 – 31th October 2019 Final Ethical Advisory Board Report Deliverable number WP10_D10.14Item Advisory Board Meeting 6 Minutes. Deliverable number WP10_D10.7(WYRED Consortium, 2019-12-10) Kearney, N. A.Advisory Board Meeting 6 Minutes Deliverable number WP10_D10.7Item Advisory Board Meeting 5 Minutes. Deliverable number WP10_D10.6(WYRED Consortium, 2019-12-10) Kearney, N. A.Advisory Board Meeting 5 Minutes. Deliverable number WP10_D10.6 Kearney, N. A. Advisory Board Meeting 5 Minutes Deliverable number WP10_D10.6 H2020-SC6-REV-INEQUAL-2016 Grant Agreement number: 727066 1st November 2016 – 31th October 2019Item Advisory Board Meeting 4 Minutes. WP10_D10.5(WYRED Consortium, 2018-12-19) Kearney, N. A.H2020-SC6-REV-INEQUAL-2016 Grant Agreement number: 727066 1st November 2016 – 30th September 2019 Advisory Board Meeting 4 WP10_D10.5Item Year 2 Quality and Evaluation Report. WP10_D10.9(Grupo GRIAL, 2018-10-31) Kearney, N. A.This document collects the findings of the evaluation process carried out between June and late November 2017 for the WYRED project (García-Peñalvo, 2016b, 2017; García-Peñalvo & Kearney, 2016). The process involved examination of project documentation and deliverables and extensive group and individual interviews with partners. The document constitutes the second evaluation-related deliverable of the project, the first of these was the quality and evaluation plan, and the insights (Griffiths et al., 2017) from the process will contribute to later versions of that document. More important, however, is the formative aspect of the evaluation, which involves the identification of achievements so far, and potential improvements to the project. Indeed, the key function of the evaluation process during the project is to provoke reflection. Potential improvements are suggested in a list of recommendations at the end of the document.