Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/1796
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLima, N.-
dc.contributor.authorViegas, C.-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Peñalvo, F. J.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-16T11:31:28Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-16T11:31:28Z-
dc.date.issued2019-10-16-
dc.identifier.citationN. Lima, C. Viegas and F. J. García-Peñalvo, "Didactical use of a remote lab: a qualitative reflection of a teacher," in TEEM’19 Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (Leon, Spain, October 16th-18th, 2019), M. Á. Conde-González, F. J. Rodríguez-Sedano, C. Fernández-Llamas and F. J. García-Peñalvo, Eds. ICPS: ACM International Conference Proceedings Series, pp. 99-108, New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2019. doi: 10.1145/3362789.3362891.en
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-4503-7191-9-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/1796-
dc.description.abstractThis work describes the teacher reflections about a didactical implementation using a remote laboratory and their impact on his practice. These reflections are analyzed from three different perspectives: how the literature review influenced the design of the didactical implementation (namely the first); how his reflection upon his practice influenced its modifications; how his research activity impacted and affected his teaching practices in the subsequent implementations and guided the modifications made. The remote lab was introduced in a Physics Course in an Engineering degree and was intended to be a learning space where students had the opportunity to practice before the lab class, supporting the development of experimental competences, fundamental in an engineer profile. After the first implementation in 2016/17 academic year it has undergone two subsequent editions with adjustments and modifications. Some features previously reported in literature such as: teacher’s experience with VISIR, the importance of an introductory activity and defining VISIR tasks objectives, were corroborated by the teacher during his practice and research. Others, such as the difficulty some students have in understanding the difference between simulation and remote labs appeared directly from his practice and were pursued in his research in order to deeply understand its implications.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherACMen
dc.subjectRemote Laboratoryen
dc.subjectVISIRen
dc.subjectHands-on Laboratoryen
dc.subjectExperimental Competence Developmenten
dc.subjectTeacher Reflectionen
dc.subjectEngineering Educationen
dc.titleDidactical use of a remote lab: a qualitative reflection of a teacheren
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lima-post.pdfArticle547,27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.