Education and generative artificial intelligence. Open challenges, opportunities, and risks in higher education Francisco José García-Peñalvo GRIAL research group Dpto. Informática y Automática Instituto Universitario de Ciencias de la Educación Universidad de Salamanca (https://ror.org/02f40zc51), Salamanca, Spain fgarcia@usal.es https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9987-5584 http://grial.usal.es https://twitter.com/frangp Abstract Keynote at the 14th International Conference on eLearning ELEARNING23, held in Belgrade Metropolitan University, Belgrade, Serbia, on September 28th, 2023. In recent months, the intertwined narratives of education and artificial intelligence (AI) have gained remarkable momentum, framing dialogues on the future of learning and teaching. The potency of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), particularly in higher education, offers a rich tableau of both promises and perils. This keynote delves into the challenges, opportunities, and risks of such technologies within the ambit of higher education. Between the most promised opportunities, we can underline: • Personalised learning pathways: GenAI promises a paradigm shift from one-size- fits-all educational models. Analysing individual student data can generate customised learning materials and study plans catering to each learner's strengths, weaknesses, preferences, and pace. • Assisting faculty: Educators can harness these technologies to generate lesson content, identify teaching materials gaps, and offer real-time feedback. This could revolutionise pedagogic strategies, making them more responsive and dynamic. • Language translation and globalisation: Generative models can instantaneously translate academic materials into multiple languages, breaking down linguistic barriers and democratising access to knowledge. However, risks are also presented in this new scenario, such as: • Over-reliance on technology: The allure of AI might seduce institutions into diminishing the role of human educators. The intangible qualities of mentorship, inspiration, and human connection, which are pivotal in the learning process, might be overshadowed. • Data privacy and security: With AI systems analysing student data to provide personalised learning experiences, concerns over data privacy emerge. How institutions store, process, and protect this data from breaches becomes paramount. • Ethical dilemmas: The capacity of GenAI to create content poses questions about authorship, authenticity, and credibility. In academic research, for instance, discerning human-generated insights from AI-generated ones can be ethically murky. Finally, higher education decision-makers need to accept AI and GenAI as a reality that now has a considerable impact in the education realm, with a special emphasis on universities. From the higher number of new challenges that universities must face, we put the focus on: • Integration with existing systems: The seamless incorporation of AI into higher education's technological ecosystems can be intricate. Institutions must grapple with the logistics of technology adoption, ensuring compatibility and minimal disruption. • Bias and representation: AI models are trained on vast amounts of data. If this data is skewed or biased, the AI’s generative capabilities may inadvertently perpetuate or exacerbate existing prejudices, leading to non-inclusive or misrepresentative learning materials. • Dependence on proprietary solutions: Large Language Models (LLM) have popularised AI in education with important applications such as ChatGPT or Bard. Universities know that the faculty and the students use these tools. However, the dependence of the third parties introduces ethical, security and privacy issues. The higher education institutions should join initiatives to build up their own models based on fine-tuned open-source LLMs. • Depersonalisation of Learning: While AI can customise learning, there’s a risk of reducing education to algorithmic interactions, side-lining the humanistic and relational dimensions of learning. Conclusion: A call for thoughtful integration The confluence of GenAI and higher education is undeniably transformative. It beckons an era where personalised, globally accessible, and highly efficient education might become the norm. However, this journey has challenges and risks that demand meticulous attention. A balanced approach is vital for higher education to benefit from GenAI. Universities must be proactive, not just in harnessing the opportunities AI presents but in pre- emptively addressing its challenges. Ethical considerations, especially concerning bias, data privacy, the collaboration consortiums to create a set of safe fine-tuned models for higher education that will be part of their institutional technological ecosystems, and the potential depersonalisation of education, should be at the forefront of any AI integration strategy. In essence, while generative AI stands as a formidable tool in the arsenal of higher education, its deployment must be thoughtful, ethical, and always in service of enhancing human-centric education, which must comply with universities’ digital transformation strategies. Only then can the true potential of this symbiotic relationship be fully realised. Keywords Education, Artificial Intelligence, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Higher Education Link to the presentation https://zenodo.org/record/8369554 DOI 10.5281/zenodo.8369554 Recommended citation F. J. García-Peñalvo, "Education and generative artificial intelligence. Open challenges, opportunities, and risks in higher education," 14th International Conference on eLearning ELEARNING23. Belgrade Metropolitan University, Belgrade, Serbia, September 28th, 2023. Available from: https://bit.ly/458jB5v. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8369554. References [1] F. J. García-Peñalvo, "Uso de ChatGPT en Educación Superior: Implicaciones y Retos," presented in Conversatorio Uso de la Inteligencia Artificial en Educación Superior: Implicaciones y Retos, Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, 12 de abril de 2023, 2023. Available from: https://bit.ly/3KUXtFd. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7821173 [2] S. Altman. (2023). Planning for AGI and beyond. In: OpenAI. Available from: https://bit.ly/3IziovT [3] S. Bubeck et al., "Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4," arXiv, art. arXiv:2303.12712v5, 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.12712. [4] S. Altman, G. Brockman and I. Sutskever. (2023). Governance of superintelligence. In: OpenAI. Available from: https://bit.ly/3q6NFjv [5] N. J. Nilsson, Principles of Artificial Intelligence (Symbolic Computation). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1982. [6] J. McCarthy, "What is Artificial Intelligence?," Computer Science Department. Stanford University, Stanford, USA, 2007. Available from: https://bit.ly/3WjNu02 [7] R. Therón, "Inteligencia Artificial en la Enseñanza de Idiomas. Herramientas y aplicaciones," presented in Inteligencia artificial en la enseñanza de idiomas: Herramientas y aplicaciones, Salamanca, España, 2023. [8] M. Alier-Forment and F. Llorens-Largo, "Cabalga el Cometa," in EP-31 Las Alucinaciones de ChatGPT con Faraón Llorens. España, 2023. https://bit.ly/3ZCNBVT [9] P. H. Diamandis and S. Kotler, Bold: How to go big, create wealth and impact the world. New York, NY, USA: Simon and Schuster, 2015. [10] T. van der Zant, M. Kouw and L. Schomaker, "Generative artificial intelligence," in Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence, V. C. Müller, Ed. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, no. 5, pp. 107-120, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31674- 6_8. [11] A. J. Argüelles-Cruz, "Plataformas de inteligencia artificial en el futuro de la educación," presented in Institute for the Future of Education Seminar, Monterrey, México, 2023. Available from: https://bit.ly/4144vfJ [12] F. J. García-Peñalvo and A. Vázquez-Ingelmo, "What do we mean by GenAI? A systematic mapping of the evolution, trends, and techniques involved in Generative AI," International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, vol. In Press, 2023. doi: 10.9781/ijimai.2023.07.006. [13] F. J. García-Peñalvo, "La integración de la inteligencia artificial generativa en la práctica docente," V Seminário Escola Digital: A Educação na Era da Inteligência Artificial. Centro de Competência TIC da Escola Superior de Educação do Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (CCTIC), Portugal, 21 de abril de 2023. Available from: https://bit.ly/3AhcCKI. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7853091. [14] R. Rosenfeld, "Two decades of statistical language modeling: where do we go from here?," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 1270-1278, 2000. doi: 10.1109/5.880083. [15] R. Collobert, J. Weston, L. Bottou, M. Karlen, K. Kavukcuoglu, & P. Kuksa, "Natural Language Processing (Almost) from Scratch," The Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 12, pp. 2493– 2537, 2011. [16] J. Devlin, M. Chang, K. Lee, & K. Toutanova, "BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding," in Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT 2019, Minneapolis, MN, USA, June 2-7, 2019, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), J. Burstein, C. Doran y T. Solorio, Eds. pp. 4171–4186, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019. doi: 10.18653/v1/N19-1423. [17] J. Hoffmann et al., "Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models," arXiv, art. arXiv:2203.15556v1, 2022. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.15556. [18] W. X. Zhao et al., "A Survey of Large Language Models," arXiv, art. arXiv:2303.18223v11, 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.18223. [19] F. J. García-Peñalvo, "Cómo se percibe la Inteligencia Artificial en la educación tras el lanzamiento de ChatGPT," Foro Internacional “La Inteligencia Artificial y la Docencia Científica”. Centro de Investigaciones Económicas, Administrativas y Sociales del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México, 24 de mayo de 2023. Available from: https://bit.ly/45rtrB3. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7967327. [20] A. Martínez Arboleda, "Producción y análisis de textos con ChatGPT," presented in Evento ReCrea, México, 2023. Available from: http://bit.ly/3m1ZSnX [21] N. Chomsky, I. Roberts and J. Watumull, "The False Promise of ChatGPT," in The New York Times, New York, USA, 2023. http://bit.ly/3GycXfx [22] E. Lee. (2023). Is ChatGPT a False Promise? In: Berkeley Blog. Available from: http://bit.ly/3UlHsv1 [23] B. Gates. (2023). The Age of AI has begun. In: GatesNotes. Available from: http://bit.ly/3nZjFF4 [24] R. Johinke, R. Cummings and F. Di Lauro, "Reclaiming the technology of higher education for teaching digital writing in a post—pandemic world," Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, vol. 20, no. 2, art. 01, 2023. doi: 10.53761/1.20.02.01. [25] W. M. Lim, A. Gunasekara, J. L. Pallant, J. I. Pallant and E. Pechenkina, "Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators," International Journal of Management Education, vol. 21, no. 2, art. 100790, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790. [26] F. Llorens-Largo. (2019). Las tecnologías en la educación: características deseables, efectos perversos. In: Universídad. Available from: https://bit.ly/3SxO72D [27] T. Wang and E. C. K. Cheng, "An investigation of barriers to Hong Kong K-12 schools incorporating Artificial Intelligence in education," Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, art. 100031, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100031. [28] W. Ma, O. O. Adesope, J. C. Nesbit and Q. Liu, "Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 901-918, 2014. doi: 10.1037/a0037123. [29] R. Yilmaz et al., "Smart MOOC integrated with intelligent tutoring: A system architecture and framework model proposal," Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, art. 100092, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100092. [30] F. J. García-Peñalvo, "Learning Analytics as a Breakthrough in Educational Improvement," in Radical Solutions and Learning Analytics: Personalised Learning and Teaching Through Big Data, D. Burgos, Ed. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, pp. 1-15, Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-4526-9_1. [31] C. Lang, G. Siemens, A. F. Wise, D. Gašević and A. Merceron Eds., "The Handbook of Learning Analytics." Vancouver, BC, Canada: SoLAR, 2022. doi: 10.18608/hla22. [32] A. J. Berlanga and F. J. García-Peñalvo, "IMS LD reusable elements for adaptive learning designs," Journal of Interactive Media in Education, vol. 11, 2005. [33] A. J. Berlanga and F. J. García-Peñalvo, "Learning Technology Specifications: Semantic Objects for Adaptive Learning Environments," International Journal of Learning Technology, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 458-472, 2005. doi: 10.1504/IJLT.2005.007155. [34] S.-T. Chu, G.-J. Hwang and Y.-F. Tu, "Artificial intelligence-based robots in education: A systematic review of selected SSCI publications," Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, art. 100091, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100091. [35] S. Marcos-Pablos and F. J. García-Peñalvo, "Emotional Intelligence in Robotics: A Scoping Review," in New Trends in Disruptive Technologies, Tech Ethics and Artificial Intelligence, J. F. de Paz Santana, D. H. de la Iglesia and A. J. López Rivero, Eds. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing no. 1410, pp. 66-75, Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-87687-6_7. [36] Y. Jin, P. Li, W. Wang, S. Zhang, D. Lin and C. Yin, "GAN-based pencil drawing learning system for art education on large-scale image datasets with learning analytics," Interactive Learning Environments, pp. 1-18, 2019. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1636827. [37] H. Vartiainen and M. Tedre, "Using artificial intelligence in craft education: crafting with text-to- image generative models," Digital Creativity, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1-21, 2023. doi: 10.1080/14626268.2023.2174557. [38] F. J. García-Peñalvo, F. Llorens-Largo and J. Vidal, "The new reality of education in the face of advances in generative artificial intelligence," RIED: Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, vol. 27, no. 1, 2024. doi: 10.5944/ried.27.1. [39] S. Barro. (2023). La pregunta equivocada sobre el uso de ChatGPT en la educación. In: Universídad. Available from: https://bit.ly/41LcAq9 [40] E. Sabzalieva and A. Valentini, "ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education: Quick start guide," UNESCO and UNESCO International Institute for Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean (IESALC), Paris, France; Caracas, Venezuela, ED/HE/IESALC/IP/2023/12, 2023. Available from: https://bit.ly/3oeYm2f [41] A. Herft, "A Teacher's Prompt Guide to ChatGPT aligned with 'What Works Best'," 2023. Available from: https://bit.ly/3K9z6my [42] D. Amo-Filva et al., "Usos y desusos del modelo GPT-3 entre estudiantes de grados de ingeniería," in Actas de las XXIX Jornadas sobre la Enseñanza Universitaria de la Informática - JENUI 2023 (Granada, España, 5-7 de julio de 2023), vol. 8, J. A. Cruz Lemus, N. Medina Medina and M. J. Rodríguez Fórtiz, Eds. pp. 415-418, Granada, España, 2023. [43] J. M. Flores-Vivar and F. J. García-Peñalvo, "Reflections on the ethics, potential, and challenges of artificial intelligence in the framework of quality education (SDG4)," Comunicar, vol. 31, no. 74, pp. 35-44, 2023. doi: 10.3916/C74-2023-03. [44] H. Khosravi et al., "Explainable Artificial Intelligence in education," Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, art. 100074, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100074. [45] A. Bozkurt, "Generative artificial intelligence (AI) powered conversational educational agents: The inevitable paradigm shift," Asian Journal of Distance Education, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 198-204, 2023. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7716416. [46] M. Perkins, "Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond," Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, vol. 20, no. 2, art. 07, 2023. doi: 10.53761/1.20.02.07. [47] F. J. García-Peñalvo, "The perception of Artificial Intelligence in educational contexts after the launch of ChatGPT: Disruption or Panic?," Education in the Knowledge Society, vol. 24, art. e31279, 2023. doi: 10.14201/eks.31279. [48] F. J. García-Peñalvo, "Avoiding the Dark Side of Digital Transformation in Teaching. An Institutional Reference Framework for eLearning in Higher Education," Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 4, art. 2023, 2021. doi: 10.3390/su13042023. [49] F. J. García-Peñalvo, "Digital Transformation in the Universities: Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Education in the Knowledge Society, vol. 22, art. e25465, 2021. doi: 10.14201/eks.25465. [50] E. P. H. Choi, J. J. Lee, M. H. Ho, J. Y. Y. Kwok and K. Y. W. Lok, "Chatting or cheating? The impacts of ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence language models on nurse education," Nurse Education Today, vol. 125, art. 105796, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105796 [51] C. Nerantzi, S. Abegglen, M. Karatsiori and A. M. Arboleda Eds., "100+ Creative ideas to use AI in education." 2023. Available from: http://bit.ly/3KSUkWf [52] T. Trust, "ChatGPT & Education," University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA, 2023. Available from: http://bit.ly/3ZoNagm. doi: 10.25416/NTR.21901629.v1. [53] F. J. García-Peñalvo, M. Á. Conde, M. Johnson and M. Alier, "Knowledge co-creation process based on informal learning competences tagging and recognition," International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals (IJHCITP), vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 18-30, 2013. doi: 10.4018/ijhcitp.2013100102.